Twitter!

Music, books, movies, TV, games, hobbies, food, and potent potables. And forum games! Pour a drink, put on your smoking jacket, light a pipe (of whatever), and settle in.
User avatar
lunchstealer
Posts: 18548
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 17:25
Location: The Local Fluff in the Local Bubble

Re: Twitter!

Post by lunchstealer »

"The constitution is more of a BDSM agreement with a safe word." - Sandy

"Dude she's the Purdue Pharma of the black pill." - JasonL

"This thread is like a dog park where everyone lets their preconceptions and biases run around and sniff each others butts." - Hugh Akston

User avatar
Dangerman
Posts: 6926
Joined: 07 May 2010, 12:26

Re: Twitter!

Post by Dangerman »

Wait did he actually say that?

User avatar
lunchstealer
Posts: 18548
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 17:25
Location: The Local Fluff in the Local Bubble

Re: Twitter!

Post by lunchstealer »

Close:
Trump’s “go back” comments were nativist, xenophobic, counterfactul and politically stupid. But they simply do not meet the standard definition of racist, a word so recklessly flung around these days that its actual meaning is being lost.
"The constitution is more of a BDSM agreement with a safe word." - Sandy

"Dude she's the Purdue Pharma of the black pill." - JasonL

"This thread is like a dog park where everyone lets their preconceptions and biases run around and sniff each others butts." - Hugh Akston

User avatar
nicole
Posts: 10656
Joined: 12 Jan 2013, 16:28

Re: Twitter!

Post by nicole »

Just takes three replies to get from
It’s interesting in its way how the right wing Internet is in a way an expression of continuous male resentment of women’s beauty and then you have a beautiful daughter and she grows up (mostly) and you come to understand female young adulthood as almost continuous psychic agony
to
Women behave like it today because men no longer fill their role as caretakers and guardians of society.

You have no idea how lucky we are to be men. The experience of being female is being filled with anxiety and neuroses unless they can rely on someone to take care of them.
fuck yeah
"Fucking qualia." -Hugh Akston

"Sliced bagels aren't why trump won; it's why it doesn't matter who wins." -dhex

User avatar
nicole
Posts: 10656
Joined: 12 Jan 2013, 16:28

Re: Twitter!

Post by nicole »

nicole wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 07:20
Just takes three replies to get from
It’s interesting in its way how the right wing Internet is in a way an expression of continuous male resentment of women’s beauty and then you have a beautiful daughter and she grows up (mostly) and you come to understand female young adulthood as almost continuous psychic agony
to
Women behave like it today because men no longer fill their role as caretakers and guardians of society.

You have no idea how lucky we are to be men. The experience of being female is being filled with anxiety and neuroses unless they can rely on someone to take care of them.
fuck yeah
Tfw you *really* should have kept reading replies before posting

Oh yeah, love 2 aggressively kiss rings
Of course this is right, but on the other hand, every act of aggression against woman is in its way a tribute to woman’s power. No different from genuflecting and kissing the ring of a clergyman tbh
Muh neuroses
Historically the solution for this was that the father would marry her off and she’d have kids. But “muh feedom” I guess.
"Fucking qualia." -Hugh Akston

"Sliced bagels aren't why trump won; it's why it doesn't matter who wins." -dhex

User avatar
Pham Nuwen
Posts: 8635
Joined: 27 Apr 2010, 02:17

Re: Twitter!

Post by Pham Nuwen »

I read those replies you posted and have no idea what they are trying to say. It seems like they are trying to make vague unease(which I assume is normal) into some grand theory on reality. I'm not an intellectual and try my best to not fake being one. Is that what they are trying to do?
Goddamn libertarian message board. Hugh Akston

leave me to my mescaline smoothie in peace, please. dhex

User avatar
Andrew
Posts: 7110
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 21:52
Location: Vale of Eternal Fire

Re: Twitter!

Post by Andrew »

Pham Nuwen wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 08:34
I read those replies you posted and have no idea what they are trying to say. It seems like they are trying to make vague unease(which I assume is normal) into some grand theory on reality. I'm not an intellectual and try my best to not fake being one. Is that what they are trying to do?
Same. I'm so out of the loop on some of these twitter conversations that reading them just makes me feel tired all over.
We live in the fucked age. Get used to it. - dhex

User avatar
JasonL
Posts: 25342
Joined: 05 May 2010, 17:22

Re: Twitter!

Post by JasonL »

Are those in the Brit Hume thread?

User avatar
nicole
Posts: 10656
Joined: 12 Jan 2013, 16:28

Re: Twitter!

Post by nicole »

JasonL wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 09:03
Are those in the Brit Hume thread?
No, this is the OP
"Fucking qualia." -Hugh Akston

"Sliced bagels aren't why trump won; it's why it doesn't matter who wins." -dhex

User avatar
nicole
Posts: 10656
Joined: 12 Jan 2013, 16:28

Re: Twitter!

Post by nicole »

Andrew wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 08:38
Pham Nuwen wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 08:34
I read those replies you posted and have no idea what they are trying to say. It seems like they are trying to make vague unease(which I assume is normal) into some grand theory on reality. I'm not an intellectual and try my best to not fake being one. Is that what they are trying to do?
Same. I'm so out of the loop on some of these twitter conversations that reading them just makes me feel tired all over.
I mean, yes, for many on the right, evopsych is a way of turning their vague unease about women's liberation into a grand theory on why women really need to be subjugated.
"Fucking qualia." -Hugh Akston

"Sliced bagels aren't why trump won; it's why it doesn't matter who wins." -dhex

User avatar
Pham Nuwen
Posts: 8635
Joined: 27 Apr 2010, 02:17

Re: Twitter!

Post by Pham Nuwen »

nicole wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 09:30
Andrew wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 08:38
Pham Nuwen wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 08:34
I read those replies you posted and have no idea what they are trying to say. It seems like they are trying to make vague unease(which I assume is normal) into some grand theory on reality. I'm not an intellectual and try my best to not fake being one. Is that what they are trying to do?
Same. I'm so out of the loop on some of these twitter conversations that reading them just makes me feel tired all over.
I mean, yes, for many on the right, evopsych is a way of turning their vague unease about women's liberation into a grand theory on why women really need to be subjugated.
But i typed my response from the kitchen!
Goddamn libertarian message board. Hugh Akston

leave me to my mescaline smoothie in peace, please. dhex

User avatar
dhex
Posts: 16193
Joined: 05 May 2010, 16:05
Location: 'murica

Re: Twitter!

Post by dhex »

nicole wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 09:30
Andrew wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 08:38
Pham Nuwen wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 08:34
I read those replies you posted and have no idea what they are trying to say. It seems like they are trying to make vague unease(which I assume is normal) into some grand theory on reality. I'm not an intellectual and try my best to not fake being one. Is that what they are trying to do?
Same. I'm so out of the loop on some of these twitter conversations that reading them just makes me feel tired all over.
I mean, yes, for many on the right, evopsych is a way of turning their vague unease about women's liberation into a grand theory on why women really need to be subjugated.
This is why fan fiction should be kept private like any shameful secret.
"i ran over the cat and didnt stop just carried on with tears in my eyes joose driving my way to work." - God

User avatar
D.A. Ridgely
Posts: 20070
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 17:09
Location: The Other Side

Re: Twitter!

Post by D.A. Ridgely »

Pham Nuwen wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 09:51
nicole wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 09:30
Andrew wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 08:38
Pham Nuwen wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 08:34
I read those replies you posted and have no idea what they are trying to say. It seems like they are trying to make vague unease(which I assume is normal) into some grand theory on reality. I'm not an intellectual and try my best to not fake being one. Is that what they are trying to do?
Same. I'm so out of the loop on some of these twitter conversations that reading them just makes me feel tired all over.
I mean, yes, for many on the right, evopsych is a way of turning their vague unease about women's liberation into a grand theory on why women really need to be subjugated.
But i typed my response from the kitchen!
But were you barefoot at the time?

User avatar
Pham Nuwen
Posts: 8635
Joined: 27 Apr 2010, 02:17

Re: Twitter!

Post by Pham Nuwen »

I was!
Goddamn libertarian message board. Hugh Akston

leave me to my mescaline smoothie in peace, please. dhex

User avatar
Dangerman
Posts: 6926
Joined: 07 May 2010, 12:26

Re: Twitter!

Post by Dangerman »

That's how you get grease burns on your toes. Get Traveler to buy you some slippers.

User avatar
Eric the .5b
Posts: 14795
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 16:29

Re: Twitter!

Post by Eric the .5b »

dhex wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 11:53
nicole wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 09:30
Andrew wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 08:38
Pham Nuwen wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 08:34
I read those replies you posted and have no idea what they are trying to say. It seems like they are trying to make vague unease(which I assume is normal) into some grand theory on reality. I'm not an intellectual and try my best to not fake being one. Is that what they are trying to do?
Same. I'm so out of the loop on some of these twitter conversations that reading them just makes me feel tired all over.
I mean, yes, for many on the right, evopsych is a way of turning their vague unease about women's liberation into a grand theory on why women really need to be subjugated.
This is why fan fiction should be kept private like any shameful secret.
Hey, now. You have to plumb the depths of fanfic and slashfic before you find anything less wholesome than evopsych.
"Better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer."
Cet animal est très méchant / Quand on l'attaque il se défend.

User avatar
Pham Nuwen
Posts: 8635
Joined: 27 Apr 2010, 02:17

Re: Twitter!

Post by Pham Nuwen »

Dangerman wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 18:33
That's how you get grease burns on your toes. Get Traveler to buy you some slippers.
You dont understand the fight I have with myself to even wear socks and shoes! We should have gone full flip flop comfort with this level of civilization we live in! Yet more proof we are not even a bronze age universe.
Goddamn libertarian message board. Hugh Akston

leave me to my mescaline smoothie in peace, please. dhex

User avatar
JasonL
Posts: 25342
Joined: 05 May 2010, 17:22

Re: Twitter!

Post by JasonL »

Back row for you Pham.

User avatar
dhex
Posts: 16193
Joined: 05 May 2010, 16:05
Location: 'murica

Re: Twitter!

Post by dhex »

Eric the .5b wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 19:32
dhex wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 11:53
nicole wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 09:30
Andrew wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 08:38
Pham Nuwen wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 08:34
I read those replies you posted and have no idea what they are trying to say. It seems like they are trying to make vague unease(which I assume is normal) into some grand theory on reality. I'm not an intellectual and try my best to not fake being one. Is that what they are trying to do?
Same. I'm so out of the loop on some of these twitter conversations that reading them just makes me feel tired all over.
I mean, yes, for many on the right, evopsych is a way of turning their vague unease about women's liberation into a grand theory on why women really need to be subjugated.
This is why fan fiction should be kept private like any shameful secret.
Hey, now. You have to plumb the depths of fanfic and slashfic before you find anything less wholesome than evopsych.
Popular invocations of evopsych are absolutely fan fiction of the lowest order.
"i ran over the cat and didnt stop just carried on with tears in my eyes joose driving my way to work." - God

User avatar
Eric the .5b
Posts: 14795
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 16:29

Re: Twitter!

Post by Eric the .5b »

dhex wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 19:55
Eric the .5b wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 19:32
dhex wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 11:53
nicole wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 09:30
Andrew wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 08:38
Pham Nuwen wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 08:34
I read those replies you posted and have no idea what they are trying to say. It seems like they are trying to make vague unease(which I assume is normal) into some grand theory on reality. I'm not an intellectual and try my best to not fake being one. Is that what they are trying to do?
Same. I'm so out of the loop on some of these twitter conversations that reading them just makes me feel tired all over.
I mean, yes, for many on the right, evopsych is a way of turning their vague unease about women's liberation into a grand theory on why women really need to be subjugated.
This is why fan fiction should be kept private like any shameful secret.
Hey, now. You have to plumb the depths of fanfic and slashfic before you find anything less wholesome than evopsych.
Popular invocations of evopsych are absolutely fan fiction of the lowest order.
I think that's what I just said. :)

Can't condemned everything for examples of their lowest order, or everything is condemned.
"Better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer."
Cet animal est très méchant / Quand on l'attaque il se défend.

User avatar
Warren
Posts: 29609
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 17:03
Location: Goat Rope MO
Contact:

Re: Twitter!

Post by Warren »

Dangerman wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 18:33
That's how you get grease burns on your toes.
If you're lucky.
THIS SPACE FOR RENT

User avatar
Pham Nuwen
Posts: 8635
Joined: 27 Apr 2010, 02:17

Re: Twitter!

Post by Pham Nuwen »

JasonL wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 19:51
Back row for you Pham.
Was I ever considered front row?
Goddamn libertarian message board. Hugh Akston

leave me to my mescaline smoothie in peace, please. dhex

User avatar
D.A. Ridgely
Posts: 20070
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 17:09
Location: The Other Side

Re: Twitter!

Post by D.A. Ridgely »

Pham Nuwen wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 21:02
JasonL wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 19:51
Back row for you Pham.
Was I ever considered front row?
Remember what Jesus said: the first shall be last and the last shall be first, and that's especially important on death row.

User avatar
Pham Nuwen
Posts: 8635
Joined: 27 Apr 2010, 02:17

Re: Twitter!

Post by Pham Nuwen »

D.A. Ridgely wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 22:35
Pham Nuwen wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 21:02
JasonL wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 19:51
Back row for you Pham.
Was I ever considered front row?
Remember what Jesus said: the first shall be last and the last shall be first, and that's especially important on death row.
Is Jesus the guy who offers 72 virgins?
Goddamn libertarian message board. Hugh Akston

leave me to my mescaline smoothie in peace, please. dhex

User avatar
D.A. Ridgely
Posts: 20070
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 17:09
Location: The Other Side

Re: Twitter!

Post by D.A. Ridgely »

Pham Nuwen wrote:
17 Jul 2019, 00:40
D.A. Ridgely wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 22:35
Pham Nuwen wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 21:02
JasonL wrote:
16 Jul 2019, 19:51
Back row for you Pham.
Was I ever considered front row?
Remember what Jesus said: the first shall be last and the last shall be first, and that's especially important on death row.
Is Jesus the guy who offers 72 virgins?
No, that's Richard Branson. He offers 72 seats on Virgin Atlantic flights, but the first rows board last and the last rows board first.

Post Reply