Marriage is Totally Gay

User avatar
lunchstealer
Posts: 15880
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 17:25
Location: The Local Fluff in the Local Bubble

Re: Marriage is Totally Gay

Post by lunchstealer » 18 Aug 2018, 17:25

Warren wrote:
18 Aug 2018, 16:29
One 'whites only' lunch counter in town isn't a problem, segregation all over town is. I'm not sure where it tips. I am sure that in 2018 America it's not necessary to force people to provide their services to all race, gender, religion, because discrimination based on those criteria is not generally tolerated.
I know some parts of the country where that wouldn't be all that true, at least for gays and maybe Muslims and Hispanics with accents.

I see the swastika/wedding thing as a false equivalence for reasons I've outlined upstream. You can tell me that sex discrimination should be allowed, but I'm not going to buy into the idea that refusing to participate in objectionable political messaging is the same thing as refusing to do a service you'd do for a man that you wouldn't do for a woman.
"The constitution is more of a BDSM agreement with a safe word." - Sandy

"Neoliberalism. Austerity. Booga booga!!!!" - JasonL

"We can't confirm rumors that Lynndie England is in the running to be Gina Haspel's personal aide." - DAR

User avatar
Aresen
Posts: 14341
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 20:18
Location: Great White Pacific Northwest

Re: Marriage is Totally Gay

Post by Aresen » 18 Aug 2018, 17:57

lunchstealer wrote:
18 Aug 2018, 17:25
Warren wrote:
18 Aug 2018, 16:29
One 'whites only' lunch counter in town isn't a problem, segregation all over town is. I'm not sure where it tips. I am sure that in 2018 America it's not necessary to force people to provide their services to all race, gender, religion, because discrimination based on those criteria is not generally tolerated.
I know some parts of the country where that wouldn't be all that true, at least for gays and maybe Muslims and Hispanics with accents.

I see the swastika/wedding thing as a false equivalence for reasons I've outlined upstream. You can tell me that sex discrimination should be allowed, but I'm not going to buy into the idea that refusing to participate in objectionable political messaging is the same thing as refusing to do a service you'd do for a man that you wouldn't do for a woman.
There are definitely some 'services' I would do for a woman that I wouldn't do for a man. ;)
If Trump supporters wanted a tough guy, why did they elect such a whiny bitch? - Mo

Those who know history are doomed to deja vu. - the innominate one

Never bring a knife to a joke fight" - dhex

User avatar
Number 6
Posts: 2854
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 16:41

Re: Marriage is Totally Gay

Post by Number 6 » 18 Aug 2018, 18:00

Warren wrote:
18 Aug 2018, 16:29

And I was about to say "Exactly, and you shouldn't have to bake a cake for them." But you're not a cake baker, and then it hit me. As an EMT, I actually don't think you should be allowed that luxury. If some gay-bashing skinhead is lying with his dick in the dirt and you get called to the scene, your job is to provide the best care you're capable of. I think that goes beyond an ethical duty. It's a legal duty as well. You don't get to say, "fuck that guy".
I expect you actually agree with that. But I'm not sure where and how I draw the line now.
In principle, I'm a free association guy. You don't have to bake cakes, you don't have to host vloggers, you don't have to do business with anyone you don't want to do business with for whatever reason.
But I have exceptions. In addition to Emergency responders, I don't think most doctors and medical service providers get to make that call either.
And there comes a point when free association becomes institutional oppression. One 'whites only' lunch counter in town isn't a problem, segregation all over town is. I'm not sure where it tips. I am sure that in 2018 America it's not necessary to force people to provide their services to all race, gender, religion, because discrimination based on those criteria is not generally tolerated.
My profession is a bit different. I take a lot of pride in being the guy who comes when someone calls for help. It doesn't matter who that person is, or what their circumstances are, we come and provide the best help we can. Period. Full stop. I've treated people with swastika tattoos who answered my inquiry about the current President* with "that nigger." I've treated drunks, druggies, postictal, hypoglycemic, and head injury patients who were doing their best to beat my ass while I treated them. All of them got the best treatment I could give.

Of course, that's what I signed up for. I spent several years going to night school and then full-time school to become a firefighter/paramedic. I never had any doubt about the requirement to treat everyone who called for help. In fact, that's exactly what I wanted. And I absolutely would say that anyone in that profession who thinks differently ought to look for another line of work.

A cake baker is a different thing, of course. I'm also generally a free association guy, and my instinct, should someone refuse to do business with me because I'm with a guy, is to say, "well, fuck you then. I'll take my money elsewhere." I may also be inclined to spread the word that business X has an issue with teh gheys, and people who have an issue with people who have an issue with teh gheys should probably go elsewhere.

However......I'm somewhat sympathetic to the idea that when that principle is applied everywhere, it can create an environment in which people do face systematic legal discrimination. Not every business in the Jim Crow era refused to serve black people because he law told them to. At the same time, I don't think the roadblocks gay people face are anywhere near as extreme as black people face even today. My personal experience is that it just isn't much of an issue. I've gotten looks before, but that's about it. (To be fair, neither the soon-to-be-ex hubby nor I come across as the sort of guys who are presumed to like guys. I don't think it was always obvious that we were a couple.)

Shorter: I'm conflicted on the baker case. In the case of medical people, cops, firefighters, pharmacists, etc, I have no conflict. The job is to serve all people who come to you. Don't like that? Find something else to do.

*A standard question to establish a person's level of mentation is 'who is the current President.'
" i discovered you eat dog dicks out of a bowl marked "dog dicks" because you're too stupid to remember where you left your bowl of dog dicks."-dhex, of course.
"Come, let us go forth and not rape together"-Jadagul

User avatar
Warren
Posts: 24228
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 17:03
Location: Goat Rope MO
Contact:

Re: Marriage is Totally Gay

Post by Warren » 18 Aug 2018, 21:58

Number 6 wrote:
18 Aug 2018, 18:00
mentation
I learned a new word.
THIS SPACE FOR RENT

User avatar
Eric the .5b
Posts: 12214
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 16:29

Re: Marriage is Totally Gay

Post by Eric the .5b » 19 Aug 2018, 03:35

Number 6 wrote:
18 Aug 2018, 18:00
In the case of medical people, cops, firefighters, pharmacists, etc, I have no conflict. The job is to serve all people who come to you. Don't like that? Find something else to do.
I have no problem whatsoever with this, given the state power wrapped up in these jobs. (Pharmacists can make decisions based on their own political views the moment they give up a state-granted monopoly on handing out prescription drugs.)

I have no conflict on the baker side, myself. I despise the bakers, but I think they have the right to refuse. Is the decision violating their right to refuse to make a cake the most important thing to worry about with Trump and other issues? No, but they still have that right. And on a damn libertarian message board, I think I should be able to say that without someone going, "Oh, no, but that's illegal, don't you understand?"
"Better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer."
"Cyberpunk never really gave the government enough credit for their ability to secure a favorable prenup during the Corporate-State wedding." - Shem

User avatar
Jake
Posts: 2573
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 18:38

Re: Marriage is Totally Gay

Post by Jake » 20 Aug 2018, 02:45

Hey, everyone... it appears to me that some of us on this thread are talking about what "is", and others are talking about what "ought" to be. And some of the "is" talkers are perhaps confusing what the "ought" talkers are saying for "is" talk, and likewise, some of the "ought" talkers are perhaps confusing what the "is" talkers are saying for "ought" talk.

(This is not aimed at anyone in particular, it's just a thing I see happening on occasion, and I suspect it might be happening in this thread as well.)
"TIL that it's genetically impossible for whales to have evolved from leg-having ancestors, millions of scientists are signing a petition to stop the teaching of evolution and evolution isn't real because Nazis wanted to kill all the Jews. Alternately, I met a moron at the museum." -- TIO

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests