Intellectualism: Dark and Webbed

User avatar
Warren
Posts: 27266
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 17:03
Location: Goat Rope MO
Contact:

Re: Intellectualism: Dark and Webbed

Post by Warren » 09 Aug 2019, 14:08

Yeah, I don't extend any more credibility to Jacobin than Quillette.
It's dumb out there kids, keep your heads down. - JasonL

User avatar
Mo
Posts: 24818
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 17:08

Re: Intellectualism: Dark and Webbed

Post by Mo » 09 Aug 2019, 14:11

JasonL wrote:To my point. I don’t believe Archie Carter would tell the truth to Jacobin if it moderated impact of his plan. Didn’t read the article but if they have emails or recordings ok, otherwise it’s just more spin.
Looks like they have actual emails.
his voice is so soothing, but why do conspiracy nuts always sound like Batman and Robin solving one of Riddler's puzzles out loud? - fod

no one ever yells worldstar when a pet gets fucked up - dhex

User avatar
JasonL
Posts: 24351
Joined: 05 May 2010, 17:22

Re: Intellectualism: Dark and Webbed

Post by JasonL » 09 Aug 2019, 14:29

Good enough then. Not taking sides just more ... this is where we are. Zeus save us once deep fakery gets going at scale.

User avatar
Warren
Posts: 27266
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 17:03
Location: Goat Rope MO
Contact:

Re: Intellectualism: Dark and Webbed

Post by Warren » 09 Aug 2019, 14:37

Mo wrote:
09 Aug 2019, 14:11
JasonL wrote:To my point. I don’t believe Archie Carter would tell the truth to Jacobin if it moderated impact of his plan. Didn’t read the article but if they have emails or recordings ok, otherwise it’s just more spin.
Looks like they have actual emails.
But they haven't made them public and the snippets they did use don't indicate any deception on Quillette's part. Which one would think they would have used those passages if they existed.
It's dumb out there kids, keep your heads down. - JasonL

User avatar
thoreau
Posts: 28441
Joined: 06 May 2010, 12:56
Location: Back to the lab again

Re: Intellectualism: Dark and Webbed

Post by thoreau » 09 Aug 2019, 14:40

There are two lines that Jacobin identifies as editorial additions. One is this:
For example, it was Quillette, not Carter, that included the line, “My union friends were horrified. While these people spend hours reproaching themselves and each other, real people in America are suffering.”
To me, it sounds like a summary/preview of something from later in the article (archived here):
Joey said he had found the whole experience depressing. It wasn’t the tedium typical of meeting proceedings that bothered him—we are both active union members, so we’re used to that. What turned him off was the atmosphere. “To be honest, I didn’t understand a lot of what was said,” he told me. “It was a bunch of nerd shit. I got the gist of what they were saying but it made me cringe. Especially the part where that old dude got yelled at for being a white supremacist for using an okay sign. What was that all about?” I asked him if he’d come back to another meeting. “No thanks,” he replied.
I don't like editors who add entire sentences, but the sentence added by the editor does not seem like the editors fabricated details on their own.

Jacobin also reports on another addition:
Quillette also suggested that DSA meetings “would drag on forever in order to accommodate the neuroses of the participants and to ensure that the proceedings observed the norms of ‘inclusivity.'”
That also sounds like a summary of the overall gist of the article, and also of publicly available video. I still don't like it, but I wouldn't characterize it as an editorial fabrication.

That said, Quillette is not blameless. They committed two grave errors, IMHO:
1) They didn't verify the identity of an author writing about personal experience. That speaks to problems with fact-checking.
2) They came across an article that was too good to be true, and rather than giving it extra scrutiny they gave it little or no scrutiny.
"They were basically like D&D min maxers, but instead of pissing off their DM, they destroyed the global economy. Also, instead of their DM making a level 7 paladin fight a beholder as punishment, he got a +3 sword of turning."
--Mo

User avatar
Warren
Posts: 27266
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 17:03
Location: Goat Rope MO
Contact:

Re: Intellectualism: Dark and Webbed

Post by Warren » 09 Aug 2019, 16:00

thoreau wrote:
09 Aug 2019, 14:40
That said, Quillette is not blameless. They committed two grave errors, IMHO:*
1) They didn't verify the identity of an author writing about personal experience. That speaks to problems with fact-checking.
2) They came across an article that was too good to be true, and rather than giving it extra scrutiny they gave it little or no scrutiny.
Yes. This is where we are.

*no need to shout.
It's dumb out there kids, keep your heads down. - JasonL

User avatar
lunchstealer
Posts: 17506
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 17:25
Location: The Local Fluff in the Local Bubble

Re: Intellectualism: Dark and Webbed

Post by lunchstealer » 09 Aug 2019, 18:40

JasonL wrote:
09 Aug 2019, 14:03
To my point. I don’t believe Archie Carter would tell the truth to Jacobin if it moderated impact of his plan. Didn’t read the article but if they have emails or recordings ok, otherwise it’s just more spin.
This strikes me as about right.
"The constitution is more of a BDSM agreement with a safe word." - Sandy

"Neoliberalism. Austerity. Booga booga!!!!" - JasonL

"We can't confirm rumors that Lynndie England is in the running to be Gina Haspel's personal aide." - DAR

User avatar
thoreau
Posts: 28441
Joined: 06 May 2010, 12:56
Location: Back to the lab again

Re: Intellectualism: Dark and Webbed

Post by thoreau » 09 Aug 2019, 22:25

FWIW, this is the editor-in-chief's response:

"They were basically like D&D min maxers, but instead of pissing off their DM, they destroyed the global economy. Also, instead of their DM making a level 7 paladin fight a beholder as punishment, he got a +3 sword of turning."
--Mo

User avatar
dhex
Posts: 16086
Joined: 05 May 2010, 16:05
Location: 'murica

Re: Intellectualism: Dark and Webbed

Post by dhex » 10 Aug 2019, 07:42

Stress testing.

The kids these days.
"i ran over the cat and didnt stop just carried on with tears in my eyes joose driving my way to work." - God

User avatar
Eric the .5b
Posts: 13794
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 16:29

Re: Intellectualism: Dark and Webbed

Post by Eric the .5b » 12 Aug 2019, 20:40

Oops, she wants to lawyer up:

"Better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer."
Cet animal est très méchant / Quand on l'attaque il se défend.

User avatar
thoreau
Posts: 28441
Joined: 06 May 2010, 12:56
Location: Back to the lab again

Re: Intellectualism: Dark and Webbed

Post by thoreau » 12 Aug 2019, 21:44

Fuck. Suing journalists? No. Please, no.
"They were basically like D&D min maxers, but instead of pissing off their DM, they destroyed the global economy. Also, instead of their DM making a level 7 paladin fight a beholder as punishment, he got a +3 sword of turning."
--Mo

User avatar
Dangerman
Posts: 6794
Joined: 07 May 2010, 12:26

Re: Intellectualism: Dark and Webbed

Post by Dangerman » 13 Aug 2019, 11:09

I'm a pleb and I know how well suing over mean words goes. WTF lady.

User avatar
D.A. Ridgely
Posts: 18947
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 17:09
Location: The Other Side

Re: Intellectualism: Dark and Webbed

Post by D.A. Ridgely » 13 Aug 2019, 12:03

Apparently, Quillette isn't well versed in American libel law, the First Amendment or New York Times Co. v. Sullivan. Defamation actions are far more likely to prevail in the UK, as I'm sure her "American lawyer" will advise her.

User avatar
thoreau
Posts: 28441
Joined: 06 May 2010, 12:56
Location: Back to the lab again

Re: Intellectualism: Dark and Webbed

Post by thoreau » 13 Aug 2019, 12:45

D.A. Ridgely wrote:Apparently, Quillette isn't well versed in American libel law, the First Amendment or New York Times Co. v. Sullivan. Defamation actions are far more likely to prevail in the UK, as I'm sure her "American lawyer" will advise her.
Be that as it may, I'm sure that the threat of litigation will improve her relationship with American journalists.
"They were basically like D&D min maxers, but instead of pissing off their DM, they destroyed the global economy. Also, instead of their DM making a level 7 paladin fight a beholder as punishment, he got a +3 sword of turning."
--Mo

User avatar
D.A. Ridgely
Posts: 18947
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 17:09
Location: The Other Side

Re: Intellectualism: Dark and Webbed

Post by D.A. Ridgely » 13 Aug 2019, 13:23

thoreau wrote:
13 Aug 2019, 12:45
D.A. Ridgely wrote:Apparently, Quillette isn't well versed in American libel law, the First Amendment or New York Times Co. v. Sullivan. Defamation actions are far more likely to prevail in the UK, as I'm sure her "American lawyer" will advise her.
Be that as it may, I'm sure that the threat of litigation will improve her relationship with American journalists.
I doubt most American journalists care. They're all far better informed about media law than the average U.S. citizen, let alone the average Australian. Moreover, many if not most are used to getting threatening mail, hate mail, even death threats. Of course, you're right that she's not going to score any points with U.S. journalists for that sort of threat, but I don't see that it matters much one way or the other.

User avatar
thoreau
Posts: 28441
Joined: 06 May 2010, 12:56
Location: Back to the lab again

Re: Intellectualism: Dark and Webbed

Post by thoreau » 13 Aug 2019, 13:40

You're taking me too seriously. If she wants to be considered a serious contributor to the conversation, person who can take some rough and tumble debate rather than a snowflake, threatening to sue her critics will not help. That was my only point.
"They were basically like D&D min maxers, but instead of pissing off their DM, they destroyed the global economy. Also, instead of their DM making a level 7 paladin fight a beholder as punishment, he got a +3 sword of turning."
--Mo

User avatar
D.A. Ridgely
Posts: 18947
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 17:09
Location: The Other Side

Re: Intellectualism: Dark and Webbed

Post by D.A. Ridgely » 13 Aug 2019, 14:06

thoreau wrote:
13 Aug 2019, 13:40
You're taking me too seriously. If she wants to be considered a serious contributor to the conversation, person who can take some rough and tumble debate rather than a snowflake, threatening to sue her critics will not help. That was my only point.
Ah, okay.

User avatar
Mo
Posts: 24818
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 17:08

Re: Intellectualism: Dark and Webbed

Post by Mo » 23 Aug 2019, 17:14

Hmm Andy Ngo may not be the disinterested journalist he claims to be.

his voice is so soothing, but why do conspiracy nuts always sound like Batman and Robin solving one of Riddler's puzzles out loud? - fod

no one ever yells worldstar when a pet gets fucked up - dhex

User avatar
Dangerman
Posts: 6794
Joined: 07 May 2010, 12:26

Re: Intellectualism: Dark and Webbed

Post by Dangerman » 23 Aug 2019, 17:24

Well, if this current tweet is accurate, he totally deserved to be assaulted without provocation months ago.

User avatar
Eric the .5b
Posts: 13794
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 16:29

Re: Intellectualism: Dark and Webbed

Post by Eric the .5b » 23 Aug 2019, 17:27

Yeah, I'd recently encountered some material to that effect. But something, something, scary antifa.
"Better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer."
Cet animal est très méchant / Quand on l'attaque il se défend.

User avatar
Mo
Posts: 24818
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 17:08

Re: Intellectualism: Dark and Webbed

Post by Mo » 23 Aug 2019, 17:28

Nowhere did I say he deserves that, but seems like he doesn’t seem to have any problem with instigating violence, as long as it’s against people he doesn’t like.
his voice is so soothing, but why do conspiracy nuts always sound like Batman and Robin solving one of Riddler's puzzles out loud? - fod

no one ever yells worldstar when a pet gets fucked up - dhex

User avatar
Dangerman
Posts: 6794
Joined: 07 May 2010, 12:26

Re: Intellectualism: Dark and Webbed

Post by Dangerman » 23 Aug 2019, 17:46

FIrst, I'm sorry. That was snide and you didn't say that. I apologize.

Second, I guess I agree that he's not disinterested.

I don't think he's instigating, but the claims that he's clearly biased against antifa have some merit. However, these claims and takedowns (having read eric's link, and done some googling) are just as biased against the right-wingers, and totally accepting of the idea that antifa are fine and should keep on doing what they do. I don't think he's doing great journalism, no.

User avatar
Eric the .5b
Posts: 13794
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 16:29

Re: Intellectualism: Dark and Webbed

Post by Eric the .5b » 23 Aug 2019, 18:50

Dangerman wrote:
23 Aug 2019, 17:46
FIrst, I'm sorry. That was snide and you didn't say that. I apologize.

Second, I guess I agree that he's not disinterested.

I don't think he's instigating, but the claims that he's clearly biased against antifa have some merit. However, these claims and takedowns (having read eric's link, and done some googling) are just as biased against the right-wingers, and totally accepting of the idea that antifa are fine and should keep on doing what they do. I don't think he's doing great journalism, no.
I'm impressed by the degree of doublethink you fit into those few sentences. In fact, when I bother to refer to you, I'm gonna call you Doublethink from now on.
"Better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer."
Cet animal est très méchant / Quand on l'attaque il se défend.

User avatar
Dangerman
Posts: 6794
Joined: 07 May 2010, 12:26

Re: Intellectualism: Dark and Webbed

Post by Dangerman » 23 Aug 2019, 19:09

So I'm unblocked and we're talking again?

User avatar
Warren
Posts: 27266
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 17:03
Location: Goat Rope MO
Contact:

Re: Intellectualism: Dark and Webbed

Post by Warren » 23 Aug 2019, 19:09

Heh
It's dumb out there kids, keep your heads down. - JasonL

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests