Corporate America Discovers the Limits of Political Posturing as a Marketing Tactic

Discuss H&R posts and other Reason articles here.
Post Reply
User avatar
Ellie
Posts: 12679
Joined: 21 Apr 2010, 18:34

Corporate America Discovers the Limits of Political Posturing as a Marketing Tactic

Post by Ellie » 24 Oct 2019, 09:49

https://reason.com/2019/10/22/corporate ... ng-tactic/

I'll admit I read this with maybe 70% of my full attention while in line at the bank, so perhaps I missed an essential part of the article. But I don't see how things like Blizzard and the NBA are discovering the limits of political posturing and now pulling back to a politically neutral view. If anything, it would be politically neutral to let individual gamers and players make political pronouncements, and then shrug when Chinese investors get mad and say, "We don't take political stances." I think kowtowing to Chinese butthurt is political posturing, just a bootlicking posture, and I would love to see Blizzard and the NBA discover its limits when they lose customer support here for siding with China.
"2019 has got to stop injecting dmt straight in the dick hole." - dhex

User avatar
Warren
Posts: 27707
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 17:03
Location: Goat Rope MO
Contact:

Re: Corporate America Discovers the Limits of Political Posturing as a Marketing Tactic

Post by Warren » 24 Oct 2019, 10:27

Ellie wrote:
24 Oct 2019, 09:49
https://reason.com/2019/10/22/corporate ... ng-tactic/

I'll admit I read this with maybe 70% of my full attention while in line at the bank, so perhaps I missed an essential part of the article. But I don't see how things like Blizzard and the NBA are discovering the limits of political posturing and now pulling back to a politically neutral view. If anything, it would be politically neutral to let individual gamers and players make political pronouncements, and then shrug when Chinese investors get mad and say, "We don't take political stances." I think kowtowing to Chinese butthurt is political posturing, just a bootlicking posture, and I would love to see Blizzard and the NBA discover its limits when they lose customer support here for siding with China.
That's the whole a point of the article. Are you sure it wasn't more like 65% of your attention?

ETA
ReRTFA It's not as explicitly "customers are revolting as I thought."
THIS SPACE FOR RENT

User avatar
Eric the .5b
Posts: 13968
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 16:29

Re: Corporate America Discovers the Limits of Political Posturing as a Marketing Tactic

Post by Eric the .5b » 25 Oct 2019, 03:13

Ellie wrote:
24 Oct 2019, 09:49
https://reason.com/2019/10/22/corporate ... ng-tactic/

I'll admit I read this with maybe 70% of my full attention while in line at the bank, so perhaps I missed an essential part of the article. But I don't see how things like Blizzard and the NBA are discovering the limits of political posturing and now pulling back to a politically neutral view.
Eh. When it comes to China, there is no "politically neutral" response for these companies. Every possible response from, "STFU about Hong Kong, guys!" to "Sorry, but we don't police our players' expression of their opinions..." strikes a political posture, much as Tuccille wants to pretend that the latter is some apolitical default thing and somehow not a classical liberal argument in direct conflict with the values of the PRC regime.

(Really, I can't help noticing that Tuccille wants Blizzard and the NBA to take a political stance he supports, while sneering at companies that take stances that Blues like, including opposing police brutality, But then, I don't really buy the idea Tuccille parrots that you can separate "true values" from "political positions" when it comes to "brands".)

I'm also at least sympathetic to claims that this is true about other issues. Though, actually, it doesn't matter whether you or me or any of us think this is true about an issue. If enough people consider a company's action to be politically freighted, it's true—at least to the extent that the dynamic Tuccille talks about applies, and the company has to pick who they piss off and who they try to make happy. There's no neutral response when some people holler that your holiday cup is anti-Christian because it's plain red; you either make them happy or you piss them off, and making them happy will probably piss someone else off. There's no automatic neutrality when you opt to do business in a place that's just put in bathroom laws or other discriminatory practices, because some fraction of the public will see that as your endorsement of those laws. You still have to decide whether you're OK with who you might piss off with that course of action or its alternatives.

(And that's of course ignoring the possibility that maybe some decision-makers at Netflix just weren't transphobes and were offended by the law in question. Tuccille gives me the impression that he doesn't think that's a "true value", WTF ever that is.)
"Better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer."
Cet animal est très méchant / Quand on l'attaque il se défend.

User avatar
Mo
Posts: 24934
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 17:08

Re: Corporate America Discovers the Limits of Political Posturing as a Marketing Tactic

Post by Mo » 27 Oct 2019, 16:25

It’s like how complaining about police brutality affecting minority communities is identity politics and complaining about immigrants is just politics.
his voice is so soothing, but why do conspiracy nuts always sound like Batman and Robin solving one of Riddler's puzzles out loud? - fod

no one ever yells worldstar when a pet gets fucked up - dhex

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests