Is that really Brian Doherty?

Discuss H&R posts and other Reason articles here.
Post Reply
User avatar
Jason
Posts: 146
Joined: 15 Jul 2010, 02:17
Location: Los Angeles, CA, USA

Is that really Brian Doherty?

Post by Jason » 03 Aug 2017, 19:15

Is "Brian" in the comments really Brian Doherty? He went on a rant against Nancy MacLean's self-contradictory arguments and goes after Tony.
This message should not be used for any purposes in the development, design, manufacture, or production of nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons.

User avatar
Warren
Posts: 21832
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 17:03
Location: Goat Rope MO
Contact:

Re: Is that really Brian Doherty?

Post by Warren » 03 Aug 2017, 20:01

Jason wrote:
03 Aug 2017, 19:15
Is "Brian" in the comments really Brian Doherty? He went on a rant against Nancy MacLean's self-contradictory arguments and goes after Tony.
No. I would be very surprised if it was.
THIS SPACE FOR RENT

User avatar
nicole
Posts: 7592
Joined: 12 Jan 2013, 16:28

Re: Is that really Brian Doherty?

Post by nicole » 04 Aug 2017, 07:12

I think it's not because commenter Brian seems to agree he hasn't read it whereas Doherty reviewed it.
"Fucking qualia." -Hugh Akston

"Privilege is having large phones fit into the garments that society expects you to wear." -Dangerman

User avatar
MJGreen
Posts: 81
Joined: 15 Feb 2017, 14:26

Re: Is that really Brian Doherty?

Post by MJGreen » 04 Aug 2017, 15:52

I'm pretty sure Doherty as commented before as "Brian Doherty," and I think "Brian" has been around for a while. It is strange that Brian's link is to reason.com, but he just said "Smooches, baby" to Tony, so unless Doherty is on some good bud this week, I'd say two different people.
Guess I should find a funny sig, huh?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest