how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

dhex's picture
red bull and vodka and xanax minus the red bull and vodka
7% (2 votes)
get blind drunk at 1 in the afternoon so everyone can stare at you and judge you for being of low morals
14% (4 votes)
punch dave eggars in the throat
10% (3 votes)
sit through the movie and be patient because that's what you do for your partner and stop being such a big baby
28% (8 votes)
meditate on how your soul is being eaten by the twee twaddleknockery masquerading as plot
17% (5 votes)
pretend you're watching tokyo drift
24% (7 votes)
Total votes: 29

Comments

Pham Nuwen's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

I voted for blind drunk but I'm confused. What's wrong with drinking in the afternoon? Such moralizing!!!

dhex's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

1 in the afternoon is a bit early, even on a holiday weekend.

Aresen's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

Suck it up.

Pham Nuwen's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

Hmph. Well, you are the arbiter of taste. ;)

Warren's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

Looks like a good rental.

mk's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

Do what I did when I was forced to take my daughter to such cinematic leaps forward as the remake of The Shaggy Dog starring that horrible guy from Home Improvement, sleep.

It may be uncomfortable, and the children will make noise, but one's mind longs for the sweet bliss of slumber when confronted with that kind of trauma.

If that doesn't work, try going to your happy place.

Also, here's something I call Mumbai Drift

Also signatures are noticeably absent. - Smacky

D.A. Ridgely's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

Keep reminding yourself it could have been The Hottie and the Nottie.

J sub D's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

I find it diificult to wrap my mind around the concept of any lover of mine wishing to see such drivel. Still, my first wife managed to drag me to a David Copperfield performance, so I guess it's possibe. I went with the be a man and suck it up option.

JD's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

1 in the afternoon is early?! I was raised to believe that as long as it's after noon, you're OK. (Certain AM exceptions are allowed for mimosas, whiskey in your coffee, etc.)

dhex's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

i'm simply not that irish.

also i meant like "drunk" not "happy"

Pham Nuwen's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

*high fives JD*

You see dhex. You're totally throwing out a perfectly fine Scots-Irish tradition.

JD's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

I'm not that Irish either. Hell, I'm largely English and Dutch, so I should be wearing Orange on St. Patrick's Day...

Pham Nuwen's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

English? Dutch? Dutch-English? Are you a puritan descendant?

JD's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

Here's the breakdown: half my ancestry is Lithuanian and arrived here about 100 years ago. The other half is English and Dutch and maybe a little Welsh, and they've been here since before the Revolution, probably mostly in the Pennsylvania area.

Pham Nuwen's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

Ah. Quaker background?

JD's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

Not as far as I know, but my knowledge of the family history that far back is pretty scant. A family tree written in an old family Bible, one or two old wills, that kind of thing. At least one branch of the family did own slaves (or _a_ slave, at any rate) so I doubt they were Quakers, eh?

Pham Nuwen's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

Well, I'm part of the McNair clan. We definitely owned slaves but we seem to be solidly Scots-Irish. My line is actually known as the "bad" one these days. My grandfather turned his back on his family to marry my grandmother. She's Mexican but the trouble is that she's crazy and anything she says is mired in falsehood. She claims that her mother was an Apache princess(probably false) and her father was Spanish(probably true). Lineage is a troublesome but interesting thing.

Shem's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

The throat punch was the only answer that solved your problem while appealing to my sense of philanthropy, so there you are.

Isaac Bartram's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

JD wrote:
Not as far as I know, but my knowledge of the family history that far back is pretty scant. A family tree written in an old family Bible, one or two old wills, that kind of thing. At least one branch of the family did own slaves (or _a_ slave, at any rate) so I doubt they were Quakers, eh?

No, actually the Quakers did own slaves, even the sainted John Bartram. It took a "sack-cloth and ashes" John the Baptist type preacher named John Woolman to get them to see the error of their ways. Not just over slavery, but over their pride and materialism, the Quakers having become one of the most politically powerful and wealthiest factions in Colonial America.

After Grandpa John had finished the King's business (as Royal Botanist he had gone to survey the flora of the King's new possession) in Florida in 1765, he left Uncle Billy in charge of an indigo plantation in Picolata with three slaves to work the place. Uncle Billy found he could not sleep at night since he feared the slaves would murder him in in his sleep. He soon abandoned the property and returned to Philadelphia. He went on to serve as the President of the Anti-Slavery Society.

D.A. Ridgely's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

I should note that, Northern Puritans and such aside, the English Southern colonists had nothing against getting liquored up, themselves; they merely disapproved of their servants doing so.

I'll return to the thread topic and note that I've seen all sorts of bad movies for love, though not for my wife, who generally dislikes movies of any sort, but for my kids. I don't know how bad Away We Go really is, but it can't be worse than Pokemon or Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle movies, both of which raised the existential questions why did I ever have children? and why did I ever stop taking drugs? while I sat there in the Stygian darkness.

On the marital front, I admit to being no fan of opera (one of the many things Groucho and I have in common) and could endure it for my wife's sake only when the Met played at Wolftrap Farm Park and we could sit on the lawn and I could eat fried chicken and drink jug wine until I passed out, usually no later than the third or forth recitativo.

GinSlinger's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

D.A. Ridgely wrote:
I should note that, Northern Puritans and such aside, the English Southern colonists had nothing against getting liquored up, themselves; they merely disapproved of their servants doing so.

Not to get pedantic, but there's little need to hold the Puritans aside. Well, it depends on what you mean by "liquored up." The New England colonists drank more per capita than the Southern colonists (it gets real messy as to whether slaves should count in the per capita figures for one, and there was a good bit of off the books drinking in both places). What could get one in trouble in New England was being "drunk." But, the standards for drunk were pretty high.

There are definitely ways that the Puritans lend themselves to the term puritanical, but surprisingly few, really. Well, at least as measured by actual, tolerated, on the ground behavior as opposed to prescription.

Warren's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

As I understand it. Colonial America lacked for water treatment facilities, and the water was infested with all manner of bacteria, parasites, and other bugs. Drinking anything less than 5% ABV was a health hazard and the whole population was half crocked from noontime on.

D.A. Ridgely's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

Not sure about that. They used rain barrels and dug wells and probably had at least as ready a supply of fresh water as their European counterparts did. Of course, the first generation was exposed to an entirely new variety of bacteria, etc., and I'm sure that took its toll for a while and may have influenced drinking habits, but my guess is that fresh water was no more difficult to obtain in the Colonies than anywhere else.

Isaac Bartram's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

Warren wrote:
As I understand it. Colonial America lacked for water treatment facilities, and the water was infested with all manner of bacteria, parasites, and other bugs. Drinking anything less than 5% ABV was a health hazard and the whole population was half crocked from noontime on.

Actually, no. One of the things that is said to have prompted North American* prohibitionism was the fact that unlike those in the foul crowded cities of Europe people on this continent had boundless supplies of pure water.

It's going away now, but time was that the first thing that happened in an American restaurant was that glasses of water would appear on the table as if by magic. This did not happen anywhere else in the world, or even in the universe.

*believe it or not, the Canadians caught it just as bad as we did.

Shem's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

They did do a hell of a lot of drinking, though. Beer with every meal and 3-5 pints of rum a week, by some estimates. And really, why shouldn't they have, with Bible events like the wedding at Canaa, where Christ turned water into wine. Drunkenness is condemned, not drinking.

Warren's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

Isaac Bartram wrote:
It's going away now, but time was that the first thing that happened in an American restaurant was that glasses of water would appear on the table as if by magic. This did not happen anywhere else in the world, or even in the universe.

*believe it or not, the Canadians caught it just as bad as we did.


I remember that. Way I remember it, the magic water stopped when the Ecologists (that's what the Greens use to call themselves) threw a hissy over how the world was running out of fresh water. Then these little cards started replacing the magic water:
It takes three glasses of water to serve one (for ice and washing). We will gladly provide you with a glass of water upon request

What do you mean the Canadians caught it just as bad as we did? Smuggling from Canada was highly profitable all through prohibition. When did Canada go dry?

Shem's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

Warren wrote:
Way I remember it, the magic water stopped when the Ecologists (that's what the Greens use to call themselves) threw a hissy over how the world was running out of fresh water.

You remember it incorrectly. It only really became widespread a couple years ago, when oil prices made energy costs skyrocket. Restaurants started looking for any way they could to save money, and that was one of them.

D.A. Ridgely's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

My guess is that there is research suggesting that making water available only on request increased beverage sales.

Shem's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

D.A. Ridgely wrote:
My guess is that there is research suggesting that making water available only on request increased beverage sales.

This would also make sense. Age-old environmental concerns that only became widespread a few years ago? Not so much.

Isaac Bartram's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

Warren wrote:

What do you mean the Canadians caught it just as bad as we did? Smuggling from Canada was highly profitable all through prohibition. When did Canada go dry?

From the infallible WIKI.

Quote:
Prince Edward Island was the first to bring in prohibition in 1900. Alberta and Ontario passed prohibition laws in 1916. Quebec implemented prohibition in 1919 but it was quickly repealed after intense public pressure.

[edit] Alcohol production in Ontario

Despite having laws until 1927 against the consumption of alcohol in Ontario, the government allowed numerous exceptions. Wineries were exempted from closure, and various breweries and distilleries remained open for the export market.[1] The fact that the "export" might be by small boat from Windsor across the river to Detroit only helped the province's economy.

edit: emphasis added.

My ex-wife's father used to make a big deal of showing his 1930s Liquor Control Board of Ontario (LCBO) passbook which allowed him to purchase 1(one) fifth of spirits a month. In the 1960s patrons of the LCBO had to read a board showing the inventory and fill out a form showing the item number and their name and address which they would then present at the counter and then wait until someone would come out with their filled order. This procedure was slightly more restrictive than the one in effect in Utah at the same time where you didn't have to give them your name and address.

Until about 1972 all licensed premises in Ontario had two sections. One was the "Men's Room" which was, as the name suggests open to men. The other was the "Ladies and Escorts Room" which was open to "ladies" accompanied by men. It was not open to unaccompanied women nor was it open to unaccompanied men. Of course, this may say more about Canadian attitudes towards sex, than it does about their attitudes towards alcohol.

Shem's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

But then, there are still Canadian kegs of booze all over the floor of Puget Sound** that liquor runners dumped overboard in order to avoid being caught during prohibition. Which just goes to show, even then, the west was better.

**Presumably empty by this point, though I wasn't about to haul one out of the water to find out.

Aresen's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

Those little loopholes in Canadian law and the fact that full prohibition died a little earlier in Canada than the US helped found the Bronfman fortune. (And the Kennedy fortune on the US side._

Isaac Bartram's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

Shem wrote:
Which just goes to show, even then, the west was better.

Well, that's true. Aresen's right, of course, I should have caught the train in the other direction.

GinSlinger's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

The colonists, north and south drank a lot. And even if the water was clean enough to drink, nobody thought drinking water was healthy (that'd have to wait til the germ theory). (There's a quote, and it may be from Franklin, about a young man disembarking from England and rushing to a water pump, whereat he drank in the cold water and promptly died. The morale of the story was to be sure to drink w"warming" drinks in the New World, i. e. alcohol.)

There are whole book-length treatments of the subject. It became rather hip a few years ago, but here is a nice summary, with an extract:

In 1790, United States government figures showed that annual per-capita alcohol consumption for everybody over fifteen amounted to thirty-four gallons of beer and cider, five gallons of distilled spirits, and one gallon of wine.

Note: the 1790 survey, as advanced as it was for it's time is riddled with errors and undercounting. The prolification of non-market, and non-reported alcohol likely pushes those estimates up. The estimates for New England are about a pint o'rum per day, per person over 15.

J sub D's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

Shem wrote:
But then, there are still Canadian kegs of booze all over the floor of Puget Sound** that liquor runners dumped overboard in order to avoid being caught during prohibition. Which just goes to show, even then, the west was better.

**Presumably empty by this point, though I wasn't about to haul one out of the water to find out.


There were subsurface conveyers traversing the Detroit River during prohibition. The tunnel between Detroit and Winsor opened in 1930 and was immediately dubbed the funnel. A Jewish organized crime syndicate, the Purple Gang, ran a lot of the bootlegging in Motown.

I loves me some local history and am at a loss to explain why it isn't taught in the public schools.

Warren's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

J sub D,
I saw on TV (so it must be true) that the Purple Gang were actually the ones behind the St. Valentines Day massacre.

Isaac Bartram's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

I heard the St. Valentines Day massacre was all Warren's fault.

J sub D's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

Warren's Jewish and in the Purple Gang?

Why am I always the last to know?

Isaac Bartram's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

No, you can see from his post that he's just trying to divert attention. Read between the lines.

dhex's picture

Re: how would you cope with having to see "away we go"?

Quote:
The estimates for New England are about a pint o'rum per day, per person over 15.

dang. they sure don't build em like they used to.