In the past few days, I have been corrected several times for dropping auxiliary verbs (usually "to be"). Instead of saying something like "the pitcher needs to be filled," I would say "the pitcher needs filled." I have been informed that the auxiliary verb needs to remain, or the phrase needs to be changed to "the pitcher needs filling."
What say you? Am I brutally maiming the English language when I drop auxiliary verbs in conversation?





















Yes.
I don't know where this trend arose, but it's wrong, wrong, wrong. It doesn't matter if the "to be" is understood. It sounds wrong and stupid. (No offense). I've never read a grammar book that suggested that leaving out the auxiliary verbs is acceptable, and even if one such grammar book did exist (or many for that matter), it's still incorrect.
UNDERPANTS HAWK
DOES NOT DESIRE YOUR TOUCH
therefore, huey lewis is the true king of rock and roll. - dhex
Either way, I can't shake the feeling that I'm being trolled. - Ken Shultz